By Ken Reed
Serena Williams wanted an apology from Carlos Ramos. It should’ve been the other way around.
Ramos was the chair umpire in the U.S. Open women’s tennis final this past Saturday, a match that pitted Serena Williams against a young upstart from Japan named Naomi Osaka. Ramos is widely recognized as one of pro tennis’ best umpires, one of a small number to earn Gold Badge distinction. That’s an important fact to digest given what transpired during the match.
The underdog Osaka surprisingly won the first set handily. Then, early in the second set, Ramos gave Williams a warning because her coach, Patrick Mouratoglou was coaching from the stands, which isn’t allowed. Williams was upset about the warning and walked from the baseline over to Ramos, sitting in the umpire’s chair, and verbally let him have it, in essence telling Ramos she isn’t a cheater and doesn’t need or want coaching from the stands. (Mouratoglou admitted after the match that he indeed was trying to coach Serena by motioning for her to come forward towards the net.) Whether Williams saw her coach’s hand signals to come forward or not is irrelevant. The larger point is, players are responsible for the actions of their coach. Strike one for Serena.
After Serena lost her serve and fell down 3-1, she completely lost control of her emotions and smashed her racquet. That is an automatic code violation in tennis, and on top of her previous warning for illegal coaching, resulted in the loss of a point. Strike two.
But Serena couldn’t let it go there. She began to verbally abuse Ramos, pointing her finger at him in a threatening way and calling him a “thief” for docking her a point. She also demanded an apology from him. Williams had plenty of time to let it go and get back to the match but chose to continue her verbal assault. (Osaka was the true victim here. She had to stand and wait on the court during Serena’s tirade, hindering the momentum she had gained by breaking Williams’ serve.) Serena couldn’t regain her composure and Ramos eventually gave her a third code violation which cost her a game. Strike three.
After a long delay, which included boos from a crowd that was largely pulling for Williams, play resumed and Osaka won the title in a raucous, crazy environment, her first major title and the first for Japan as well.
Unfortunately, the boorish behavior of Williams, who will be 37 later this month, took away a lot of the joy from winning for the 20-year-old Osaka. Osaka has idolized Williams since her childhood. After the match, instead of celebrating the biggest win of her career, Osaka sat on her chair with a towel over her head, filled with conflicting emotions. Shame on Serena for putting her in this unfortunate — but easily preventable — spot.
Osaka carried herself with great poise, composure and dignity, during and after this match, while Serena acted like a spoiled brat and bully. To win, not only did Osaka have to overcome Williams tremendous tennis talent, she had to overcome Serena’s terrible behavior and the unsportsmanlike crowd response it generated.
Yes, Williams did exhibit grace at the awards ceremony, asking the crowd to stop booing and congratulating Osaka for playing a great match. But by then, the damage had been done.
Osaka, instead of enjoying her big win, sadly felt she needed to apologize to the New York crowd during the awards ceremony. “I felt a little bit sad because I wasn’t really sure if they were booing at me or if it wasn’t the outcome that they wanted,” said Osaka during a Today Show appearance on Monday morning. “And then I also could sympathize because I’ve been a fan of Serena my whole life and I knew how badly the crowd wanted her to win.”
Surprisingly, instead of admonishing Serena for her behavior, many in the tennis world have come to her defense, from television commentators, to former players, to several newspaper columnists. Their primary argument is that a male player wouldn’t have received a game penalty from Ramos for the same behavior and words. That may or not be the case. But the key point here isn’t what male players might or might not be able to get away with on the bad sportsmanship front, but how Serena and all tennis players should conduct themselves during competition.
Tennis great Martina Navratilova had this to say on that subject in an op-ed column she wrote for The New York Times:
“If, in fact, the guys are treated with a different measuring stick for the same transgressions, this needs to be thoroughly examined and must be fixed. But we cannot measure ourselves by what we think we should also be able to get away with. In fact, this is the sort of behavior that no one should be engaging in on the court.”
Exactly. The rules of tennis need to be applied consistently regardless of gender. No argument there. That said, there isn’t any sport — played by men or women — in which Serena’s behavior Saturday would be tolerated. She would’ve received a technical foul in basketball, a yellow card in soccer, unsportsmanlike penalty in football and a likely ejection in baseball. In golf, an individual sport like tennis, you simply would never see behavior like Serena displayed toward a rules official.
This isn’t the first time that Williams has lost her composure and exhibited poor sportsmanship in a U.S. Open. In a 2009 U.S. Open semifinal match against Kim Clijsters, the lineswoman called a foot fault on a serve by Williams. Serena responded by walking toward the lineswoman (yes woman; it would be hard for Serena to claim sexism in this case), shaking her racket and pointing. Williams said: “I’m going to shove this [expletive] ball down your [expletive] throat,” according to CBSsports.com.
Nice. How’s that for an example of sportsmanship and respecting the game?
During the past year, Serena has mentioned several times that she’s trying to be a role model for her daughter, Alexis. After the Osaka match, she mentioned her daughter again, saying she wanted her to learn to stand up for herself. That’s a very worthy goal. And toward that objective, as arguably the greatest female tennis player in history, she’s in a great position to lead a movement for equal treatment under the rules for female tennis players. In addition, she could also take the lead in fighting to get rid of the silly rule that bans coaching during matches in tennis.
But during the U.S. Open final, she didn’t provide her daughter with an example of how to stand up for yourself. Instead, what she did provide — to her daughter and all young girls and boys watching — was a classic example of terrible sportsmanship.
Unfortunately, in the end, the 2018 U.S. Open women’s final will be remembered for Serena’s shameful behavior, not Osaka’s courageous win.
And that’s the biggest shame of all.
— Ken Reed, Sports Policy Director, League of FansPrint
- “Should College Athletes Be Paid?” Ken Reed on The Morning Show from Wisconsin Public Radio
Ken Reed appears on KGNU Community Radio in Colorado (at 02:30) to discuss equality in sports and Title IX.
Ken Reed appears on the Ralph Nader Radio Hour (at 38:35) to discuss his book The Sports Reformers: Working to Make the World of Sports a Better Place, and to talk about some current sports issues.
- Ken Reed's Author Page on Amazon
- League of Fans is a sports reform project founded by Ralph Nader to fight for the higher principles of justice, fair play, equal opportunity and civil rights in sports; and to encourage safety and civic responsibility in sports industry and culture.
A League of Fans Special Report