* Good Sports *
– NBA and Player’s Association Reach Labor Agreement, Avoid Lockout
Congratulations to the National Basketball Association and NBA Player’s Association for reaching a compromise on a new six-year labor agreement. Prior to last week’s pact, conventional wisdom was that the NBA owners would lock-out the players and take a similar hard-line approach toward maximizing revenues for owners as did the National Hockey League.
But perhaps the NHL model, under the inept direction of Commissioner Gary Bettman, turned out to be the biggest reason NBA Commissioner David Stern ultimately chose a more reasonable path. NHL owners continue to lock-out their players in a disastrous campaign that has, so far, canceled the entire 2004-05 season, and caused widespread fan resentment with questions as to whether the NHL can fully recover.
For Stern, orchestrating another NBA lockout (the last of which forced the shortening of the 1998-99 season from 82 games to 50) without a single sufficient reason for doing so would have caused potentially irreparable damage to the league. But recognizing that, financially, NBA owners are doing very well and that, competitively, the league is benefiting from the NHL debacle, this was no time for the NBA to risk sinking to the NHL’s level.
Provisions in the NBA’s new collective bargaining agreement that benefit the owners include shorter player contracts, smaller annual raises, four random drug tests a year, an age minimum of 19 and a minor league. To the benefit of the players, they receive at least 57 percent of the league’s revenues, a 3 percent increase in the NBA’s salary cap and an additional two jobs per team up to 14 players.
League of Fans opposes the 19-year old age limit (the NBA tried for 20). It is a discriminatory policy, obviously directed at young black players, that harms the freedom for these young adults to make a living (for more on racism and the age restriction, see Dave Zirin’s excellent April 21, 2005 column “Straight Outta High School: Jermaine O’Neal, Race, and Hip Hop”). Nevertheless, the age restriction was collectively bargained, and will go into effect in June, 2006. To his credit, Commissioner Stern hinted at an upcoming directive that will ban all NBA personnel from scouting teenagers in high school gyms. A similar mandate should be applied to such school-kid scouting and recruiting meddlers as Major League Baseball, Nike and the U.S. Armed Forces as well.
For commish, CBA helps ‘avoid the Apocalypse’
By Marc Stein, ESPN.com – June 21, 2005
Players’ union ratifies new contract with league
Reuters – June 29, 2005
A limit that defies logic
By Dan Wetzel, Yahoo! Sports – June 27, 2005
League of Fans’ Statement on the NHL’s Cancellation of the 2004-05 Season and the Ongoing Lockout – February 18, 2005
League of Fans on Collective Bargaining
* Bad Sports *
– Robin Hood in Reverse: Supreme Court Decides Private Use is “Public Use” in Eminent Domain Case
From Field of Schemes – June 23, 2005:
“The U.S. Supreme Court has made its ruling in the Kelo v. City of New London case: In a 5-4 ruling, the court declared that (in the words of the Associated Press) ‘local governments may seize people’s homes and businesses against their will for private development.’ The ruling clears the way for local governments to continue using eminent domain proceedings to clear land for private projects – including sports stadiums – on the grounds that creating economic development is a ‘public use.’”
From The Sports Economist – June 25, 2005:
“As readers of this blog well know, the ‘economic development’ claim is a routine ploy in the political jousting over stadium subsidies. . . . The use of an economic development rationale to justify stadium subsidies has a long history. This history has been extensively studied by sports economists. Here is what we know: (i) Every case for a stadium subsidy is accompanied by an ‘economic impact analysis’ showing that investment in the stadium will help develop the local economy. (ii) Scholars view these studies as political propaganda, not as objective analysis. (iii) Objective evidence that such development actually takes place is meager at best – virtually every published study fails to find a significant economic impact from sports stadia.
The economic literature on stadium subsidies is thus very clear: economic development provides no basis for justifying public investment in stadia. Yet peddlers of fantasy under the economic development banner make their living aiding and abetting major league owners in their quest for public handouts. In Kelo, the Supreme Court had the opportunity to ban this tripe from the courtroom in takings cases. But the decision gives these same peddlers the license to aid and abet developers in tearing down neighborhoods.”
From Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s dissenting opinion – June 23, 2005:
“Today the Court abandons this long-held, basic limitation on government power. Under the banner of economic development, all private property is now vulnerable to being taken and transferred to another private owner, so long as it might be upgraded i.e., given to an owner who will use it in a way that the legislature deems more beneficial to the public in the process. To reason, as the Court does, that the incidental public benefits resulting from the subsequent ordinary use of private property render economic development takings ‘for public use’ is to wash out any distinction between private and public use of property and thereby effectively to delete the words ‘for public use’ from the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.
. . . Any property may now be taken for the benefit of another private party, but the fallout from this decision will not be random. The beneficiaries are likely to be those citizens with disproportionate influence and power in the political process, including large corporations and development firms. As for the victims, the government now has license to transfer property from those with fewer resources to those with more. The Founders cannot have intended this perverse result.”
Ralph Nader’s statement – June 24, 2005:
The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Kelo v City of New London mocks common sense, tarnishes constitutional law and is an affront to fundamental fairness.
The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution permits government to seize private property for a “public use,” such as a highway, railroad, or military facility, provided it gives the owner “just compensation.” Many state constitutions have similar provisions. But in modern times it has become common for the government, usually at the state or local level, to seize property and transfer it to another private party rather than maintaining it for public use.
Hundreds of abuses of eminent domain have occurred during the last few decades, with municipalities playing reverse Robin Hood‚ taking from ordinary citizens and giving to powerful individual developers or corporations. In many cases, the alleged public benefit is a transparent cover for what amounts to legalized theft.
With today’s decision, the Court has abdicated its role as guardian of the Constitution and individual rights. This decision authorizes courts across the country to allow self-defining misuses of “public use” and “public benefit” requirements. State courts, however, remain free to interpret their own constitutions as imposing more reasonable restraints on government taking of individual property.
For a more detailed discussion of this topic see: Ralph Nader & Alan Hirsch, “Making Eminent Domain Humane,” 49 Villanova Law Review 207 (2004).
Kelo Et Al. v. City of New London Et Al.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 23, 2005
Supreme Court Rules Cities May Seize Homes
By Matt Apuzzo, Associated Press – June 24, 2005
Proposal Made to Seize Justice Souter’s Property
Associated Press – June 29, 2005
Eminent Domain explanation and background
League of Fans on Stadiums and Arenas
Sports Forum Podcast
Episode #13 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: A Conversation With Long-Time MLB Exec Dan Evans About What’s Right With Baseball and What Could Be Better – Evans is a former general manager for the Los Angeles Dodgers and is currently a consultant for Go the Distance Baseball, which owns the Field of Dreams movie site. We discuss his experience at the MLB game at Field of Dreams; his thoughts on the appeal of the Field of Dreams, and baseball in general.
Follow on Facebook: @SportsForumPodcast
Episode #12 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: A Fun Chat With Dan Gutman, Author of the Baseball Card Adventure Series for Kids
Episode #11 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: The Latest on Brain Trauma, Concussions and CTE with Dr. Chris Nowinski – Nowinski is CEO of the Concussion Legacy Foundation.
Episode #10 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: An Issues Discussion With Paul Dolan – Dolan is the Cleveland Indians Owner and CEO.
Episode #9 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: Talking Sports Issues With Ralph Nader – Nader is a consumer advocate and was named one of the “100 Most Influential Americans of the 20th Century” by Time magazine. He is the founder of League of Fans.
Episode #8 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: How Can We Save College Sports From Overcommercialization and Professionalization? – The guest is Dr. David Ridpath, a sports business professor and past president of the Drake Group
Media"How We Can Save Sports" author Ken Reed appears on Fox & Friends to explain how there's "too much adult in youth sports."
Ken Reed appears on Mornings with Gail from KFKA Radio in Colorado to discuss bad parenting in youth athletics.
“Should College Athletes Be Paid?” Ken Reed on The Morning Show from Wisconsin Public Radio
Ken Reed appears on KGNU Community Radio in Colorado (at 02:30) to discuss equality in sports and Title IX.
Ken Reed appears on the Ralph Nader Radio Hour (at 38:35) to discuss his book The Sports Reformers: Working to Make the World of Sports a Better Place, and to talk about some current sports issues.
Sports & Torts – Ken Reed, Sports Policy Director, League of Fans – at the American Museum of Tort Law
League of Fans is a sports reform project founded by Ralph Nader to fight for the higher principles of justice, fair play, equal opportunity and civil rights in sports; and to encourage safety and civic responsibility in sports industry and culture.
Order from Amazon
Order from Amazon
Order from Amazon
Ken Reed’s Author Page on Amazon