The stadium project that was initially touted as costing $200 million in public funds, and then $325 million, and then $440 million, and then supposedly capped at $611 million, is now becoming an ever larger taxpayer burden. Incoming Council Chair Vincent Gray agreed last year when it was suggested that the project might hit the billion-dollar mark, and it now appears that conjecture might turn to reality — unless the Council acts now to stop the hemorrhaging.
Despite the sunk costs at the new site, having the team play at RFK stadium remains the best option for the District. Upgrading RFK would still be cheaper than concluding the new stadium; and the infrastructure fiascos at the new site could be avoided if the team were to continue playing at RFK. RFK is an alternative that provides more cost certainty to taxpayers, offers driving access, parking and public transit already capable of handling game crowds, and supplies a manageable timeline for the project, and even provides development opportunities. Moreover, the new stadium is now actually standing in the way of development at the S. Capitol St. site.
Assuming, however, the Council mistakenly remains committed to the S. Capitol St. site for the new stadium, there are a series of steps that should be taken to mitigate the damage.
1. The DC Council should acknowledge that a bait-and-switch was pulled on the citizenry. The Council approved the deal on the grounds that $611 million was going to cap the District’s investment in the deal. In tragic fact, the contract provides for open-ended liability for the District, which, with minor exceptions, is obligated to pick up the expense of the project, whatever it costs. The political posturing of the cap means nothing against the legal obligation of the lease.
2. The Council must clarify for itself and the citizenry what if any cost overruns the project is incurring. Council Member David Catania says that cost overruns already exceed $100 million. The Council should request that DC Auditor Deborah Nichols immediately assess what cost overruns have already occurred, and what additional overruns are now foreseeable, and publish her audit.
3. The Council, with the assistance of Ms. Nichols, should assess the reasons for any cost overruns. The contract with the team imposes penalties on the District for failing to meet the deadline, but the penalties are bounded. It is quite possible that existing or future overrun costs will exceed the District’s liability for failing to meet the deadline. If so, it makes sense to slow down, and save money.
4. The Council must not rush to lavish more money on this project by paying for parking facilities or subsidizing a developer to do so. With the collapse of the Miller development proposal (which, incidentally, contained hidden costs, because the gifted land and development rights were not characterized as an expense) it now appears that the Mayor plans to ask the Council for $75 million in additional funding for parking. Under the terms of the contract, the District is required to provide only 1,225 parking spots. It should not subsidize developers to construct more, nor spend more public funds to build parking facilities. The team is being handed a publicly funded stadium, making only the slightest contribution to its construction. If new monies are needed for parking, the team owners should provide them.
5. Under no circumstances should the Council agree to “emergency” legislation to authorize new funding for anything connected to the project. That the Mayor has been out of the country and unengaged with the issue does not make it an “emergency” when he returns. The claim of urgency is simply an excuse to avoid hearings and a full public debate over the terms of any new funding. Needlessly considering major funding legislation with little or no lead time is not a useful approach for a considered deliberation of the available options. The offer from Monument Realty that would provide most of the needed parking for a two-year period deserves consideration, as do other possibilities.
6. The Washington Post reports that the Lerners, the team owners, have made intricate demands for stadium design changes. The Sports and Entertainment Commission should publish all of these requested changes, and their estimated costs. Under no circumstances should the public be left with the bill for last-minute changes demanded by the private tenant.
It is clear now that the project is an ever-worsening debacle, with a one-sided lease that will impose escalating costs on the funder (the District) with little or no additional obligations on the beneficiary (the team). The stadium deal that was originally promised to cost $200 million is speeding in the direction of $1 billion — with control of the stadium handed over and benefits to be reaped by private owners. The Council needs to pause and reflect on the stadium deal and then get this publicly funded project back under public control.
Two years ago this month, DC residents peaceably demonstrated against this stadium giveaway. The Washington Post quoted Mayor Williams who described such public concern over a (then) $440 million deal as “populist grandstanding.” It’s way overdue for the Council to put its foot down on this disrespect of taxpayers and disregard for more important priorities for tax dollars than increasing the profits of commercial sports companies.
Jim Bouton, former Yankee pitcher and author of Ball Four
Ralph Nader, consumer advocate and author
Neil deMause, co-author of Field of Schemes
Dave Zirin, columnist for SLAM magazine and author of What’s My Name, Fool?
Takoma Park, MD
Robert Weissman, director of Essential Action and co-author of Corporate Predators
Shawn McCarthy, director of League of Fans
 Spencer S. Hsu and Mark Asher, “District Pledges To Finance Half Of New Stadium,” The Washington Post, December 20, 2001. See also Mark Asher and Craig Timberg, City’s Share For Stadium Increasing; Mayor Says D.C.’s Cost Could Hit $300 Million,” The Washington Post, December 22, 2002 (“The mayor’s suggestion that a city government financing package might reach $300 million surprised members of the D.C. Council who had been working under the assumption that the limit was $200 million. That’s the amount Williams pledged in a letter to baseball officials in November 2000.”)
 Marc Fisher, “For the Stadium, It’s Decision Time; for the Mayor, It’s the Offseason,” Washington Post, October 12, 2006
Sports Forum Podcast
Episode #31 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: Foul Ball Safety Is Still an Important Issue at Ballparks – Our guests are Jordan Skopp, founder of FoulBallSafety.com and Greg Wilkowski, a Chicago based attorney. We discuss the historical problem of foul balls injuring fans, why some teams are still hesitant to put up protective netting in some minor league and college baseball parks, and the fact the vast majority of players are for more protective netting in stadiums.
Follow on Facebook: @SportsForumPodcast
Episode #30 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: The State of College Athletics with Dr. David Ridpath: Problems and Potential Solutions – Ridpath is a sports administration professor at Ohio University and a member of The Drake Group, a college sports reform think tank.
Episode #29 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: The Honorable Tom McMillen Visits League of Fans’ Sports Forum – McMillen is a former All-American basketball player, Olympian, Rhodes Scholar and U.S. Congressman. We discuss the state of college athletics today.
Episode #28 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: A Chat With Mano Watsa, a Leading Basketball and Life Educator – Watsa is President of PGC Basketball, the largest education basketball camp in the world. We discuss problems in youth sports today.
Episode #27 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: Kids’ Sports: How We Can Take Back the Game and Restore Quality Family Time In the Process – Linda Flanagan is author of “Take Back the Game: How Money and Mania Are Ruining Kids’ Sports and Why It Matters.” We discuss how commercialized and professionalized youth sports are hurting kids and their families.
Episode #26 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: How Can We Fix Youth Sports? – John O’Sullivan is Founder and CEO of Changing the Game Project and author of “Changing the Game: The Parents Guide to Raising Happy, High Performing Athletes and Giving Youth Sports Back to Our Kids.”
Media"How We Can Save Sports" author Ken Reed appears on Fox & Friends to explain how there's "too much adult in youth sports."
Ken Reed appears on Mornings with Gail from KFKA Radio in Colorado to discuss bad parenting in youth athletics.
“Should College Athletes Be Paid?” Ken Reed on The Morning Show from Wisconsin Public Radio
Ken Reed appears on KGNU Community Radio in Colorado (at 02:30) to discuss equality in sports and Title IX.
Ken Reed appears on the Ralph Nader Radio Hour (at 38:35) to discuss his book The Sports Reformers: Working to Make the World of Sports a Better Place, and to talk about some current sports issues.
- Reed Appears on Ralph Nader Radio Hour League of Fans’ sports policy director, Ken Reed, Ralph Nader and the New York Times’ Tyler Kepner discussed a variety of sports issues on Nader’s radio show as well as Reed’s updated book, How We Can Save Sports: A Game Plan. Reed's book was released in paperback in February, and has a new introduction and several updated sections.
League of Fans is a sports reform project founded by Ralph Nader to fight for the higher principles of justice, fair play, equal opportunity and civil rights in sports; and to encourage safety and civic responsibility in sports industry and culture.
Vanderbilt Sport & Society - On The Ball with Andrew Maraniss with guest Ken Reed, Sports Policy Director for League of Fans and author of How We Can Save Sports: A Game Plan
Sports & Torts – Ken Reed, Sports Policy Director, League of Fans – at the American Museum of Tort Law
Order from Amazon
Order from Amazon
Order from Amazon
Ken Reed’s Author Page on Amazon