Debating sports coverage with Ralph Nader
THE WASHINGTON POST
Posted at 04:39 PM ET, 06/28/2011
By Dan Steinberg
So Ralph Nader swung by The Post newsroom on Tuesday afternoon to talk sports with a few editors and reporters. He wanted specifically to discuss a new consumer advocacy group he’s launching for sports fans, and the lengthy fan manifesto that will help guide that group’s work over the next few months.
Now, some of these issues are quite interesting, and many of them — academic corruption, commercialism, performance-enhancing drugs, the professionalization of youth sports, publicly financed stadiums, the BCS — have been covered extensively by The Post, in a variety of places.
Still, one of Nader’s focuses touched a bit close to home: how we reporters all theoretically want to make the world a better place, but how we might sort of be dragged down to some more pedestrian spot by incessantly covering, you know, sports. As in, who won, who lost, and who failed his conditioning test over and over again.
Not to subject you to the dialog from this meeting, but it’s the kind of thing I often debate myself over a fourth pour of Edmund Fitzgerald Porter, when I’m wondering whether transcribing a LaVar Arrington interview with Warren Sapp about Albert Haynesworth is a noble way to help readers pass a few minutes at work and allow me to pay for my daughter’s college education, or whether I’d be of greater use to society by harvesting organic kumquats.
This all sort of started when Nader observed that our little corner of the paper is really “the spectator sports page,” and when he wondered “if the ethos of the [sports] page is more just entertainment” or something grander.
“You’re covering the scores, the games, the managerial shifts, all that, and there isn’t that much coverage on these themes I just mentioned,” Nader said, referring to the serious consumer and societal issues in his manifesto. “We don’t get coverage, we get blacked out, because it’s not part of the routine of the sports pages. It’s sort of out of sync. It’s supposed to be a fun sports page, not a lot of gloom and doom and all the rest.”
And later, this all got even deeper.
“It’s time for introspection, is what I’m saying,” he told us. “And what we can do is we can put out our reports and recommendation and get feedback, but around the country the sports pages have got to look at themselves in the mirror and basically say, aren’t we able to do better? Aren’t we reflecting something other than [the desires of] the advertisers and the managers and all the rest of them?
“I mean, there’s more [written] about what happens after the game when reporters get in the clubhouse than there is on a lot of these subjects, that are far more important,” he said. “And the one I can really excoriate The Post for, I can’t even remember this guy’s name, but he showed up late for practice and there were like three, four articles on it.”
Now, I’m not sure who exactly we were talking about here. Elijah Dukes? Haynesworth? Kwame Brown? Mike Green? To keep things simple, I like to assume all issues of overcoverage revolve around Haynesworth, and that’s what Mike Wise suggested to Nader.
“Him, or someone before that,” Nader said. “You know, give me a break. You can give people sugar, and people like sugar, we all like sweets, most of us. But you give ‘em too much, they get diabetes. They get tooth decay. Same thing for the mind.”
“He needs page views,” sports editor Matt Vita joked, with a nod in my direction.
“It’s a complicated question,” I piped up, as my daily existential career doubts began to swirl in pleasing shades of gray around my ears. “But the thing is, a guy on the Redskins shows up late to practice, and we could write 15 articles in a row, 15 days, and our web traffic would indicate that people still want more of that.”
“That’s true, because that’s the fallacy of the Sensuality Ladder that you have to resist,” Nader responded.
“Of the which ladder?” I asked, while Wise made some sort of joke about getting more sensuality into the sports section.
“The fallacy off the Sensuality Ladder is it lets you get away with it, up to a point where you deteriorate everything that you do and the people you are reporting [about],” Nader continued.
“Yeah, that happened a couple years ago with me,” I agreed.
“So, the fallacy is for example, let’s take politics, right?” he went on. “The biggest issue of the last four weeks in Congress was Weiner, because that is on the low rung of the Sensuality Ladder. And that’s true of food. How do they market food to kids? Taste, texture, easy to chew, pretty to look at, maybe you get a doodad here or there. Low on the Sensuality Ladder.
“Any time a society goes down – and in the scholarly literature it’s calledExtreme Hedonism – any time a society goes down to that level… it’s irresistible because for the short range, it works. You get [web] traffic, right? Any time it goes down to that level, watch out. It’s like an empire that doesn’t know when to stop. All empires devour themselves, because they don’t know when to stop. So we’re not asking for a complete evolutionary upside down turnaround, but just some balance. And you have the talent. That’s the tragedy. I mean, you have the talent to really break through again and again and be a model for other newspapers around the country.”
Well, maybe we do. Certainly I get requests all the time to write more about fan treatment, and ticket sales, and misleading marketing efforts, or to highlight more noble amateur athletes who are dying for the slightest bit of recognition. And instead, I transcribe radio interviews about conditioning tests and nights out at Caddies and tall Czech kids smooching their girlfriends. But this all sort of relates back to something Nader said earlier, about how we’ve constructed this little oasis in the sports world, where we sort of pretend we’re living in a fantasy land, absent injustice and pain and war and suffering.
“You’re living an ideal life,” he said of game-reporting sports folks. “Sports and the arts are what people would do in a perfect society. What are they gonna do with their time, right?”
I suggested they could also do organic gardening or pickling or something like that, but Nader said that counts as the arts, since our idealized people would be doing it for enjoyment rather than sustenance.
Either way….I mean, I don’t know. Yes, this is a consumer-driven business. Yes, we still aspire to do good. Yes, we know that sports are sort of silly. Yes, we also acknowledge that sports generate real news issues, and that the press can influence certain outcomes for the better. No, we probably won’t win the Pulitzer for posting photos of Jim Riggleman in a Bethesda bar, but yeah, we sure do get a lot of page views for something like that. And remember, there’s still that paying for college tuition thing.
Anyhow, I’d like to reflect some more about this, but I heard Donovan McNabb said something about John Beck’s throwing motion during a radio appearance in Topeka, so I gotta run.
Sports Forum Podcast
Episode #26 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: How Can We Fix Youth Sports? – John O’Sullivan is Founder and CEO of Changing the Game Project and author of “Changing the Game: The Parents Guide to Raising Happy, High Performing Athletes and Giving Youth Sports Back to Our Kids.” We discuss overzealous adults in youth sports, the dangers of sport specialization, youth sports entrepreneurs and the profit-at-all-costs mindset, and the growing socio-economic gap in youth sports.
Follow on Facebook: @SportsForumPodcast
Episode #25 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: Physical Education Should Be a Critical Component of K-12 School Design – Michael Horn is co-founder of the Clayton Christensen Institute for Disruptive Innovation.
Episode #24 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: Mental Health and Athletes: Ending the Stigma – Nathan Braaten and Taylor Ricci are the founders of Dam Worth It, a non-profit created to end the stigma around mental health at colleges and universities through sport, storytelling, and community creation.
Episode #23 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: Olympian Benita Fitzgerald Mosley Talks Title IX, Youth Sports and the Olympics.
Episode #22 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: Rethinking Sports Fandom with Author Craig Calcaterra – We discuss Calcaterra’s new book “Rethinking Fandom: How to Beat the Sports-Industrial Complex at Its Own Game” and explore new ways to be a fan.
Episode #21 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: Chatting About a Broken Game With Baseball Writer Pedro Moura – Moura is a national baseball writer for Fox Sports. We discuss how and why the game of baseball is broken, what factors caused it, and offer a few thoughts on how to “fix” a great game.
Media"How We Can Save Sports" author Ken Reed appears on Fox & Friends to explain how there's "too much adult in youth sports."
Ken Reed appears on Mornings with Gail from KFKA Radio in Colorado to discuss bad parenting in youth athletics.
“Should College Athletes Be Paid?” Ken Reed on The Morning Show from Wisconsin Public Radio
Ken Reed appears on KGNU Community Radio in Colorado (at 02:30) to discuss equality in sports and Title IX.
Ken Reed appears on the Ralph Nader Radio Hour (at 38:35) to discuss his book The Sports Reformers: Working to Make the World of Sports a Better Place, and to talk about some current sports issues.
- League of Fans Sports Policy Director Ken Reed quoted in Washington Post column titled "What happened to P.E.? It’s losing ground in our push for academic improvement," by Jay Mathews
League of Fans is a sports reform project founded by Ralph Nader to fight for the higher principles of justice, fair play, equal opportunity and civil rights in sports; and to encourage safety and civic responsibility in sports industry and culture.
Sports & Torts – Ken Reed, Sports Policy Director, League of Fans – at the American Museum of Tort Law
Order from Amazon
Order from Amazon
Order from Amazon
Ken Reed’s Author Page on Amazon