NFL chooses to keep coercive, anti-fan blackouts
by Shawn McCarthy
Guest Analyst for League of Fans
All Hail the National Football League for its merciful generosity during a time of massive economic struggle and high unemployment. Headlines regarding a recent adjustment to the NFL’s blackout policy include: “New NFL blackout rule good for fans”; “Lawmakers cheer NFL change to blackout rule”; “NFL fans cheer blackout changes”; and this from ESPN, “League scores big on blackouts.”
Really? Why all of the overenthusiastic praise directed at the NFL? Let’s not forget that, rather than seizing the opportunity to rid themselves of a major anti-fan, anti-consumer and anti-taxpayer policy, the team owners who collectively make up the NFL have chosen to keep using the blackout blackmail into the future.
Yes, the NFL now enables each team to decide whether they will allow home games to be televised if 85 percent of the tickets have been sold, as opposed to all of them. To the untrained eye, this may be seen as a slight improvement. But consider that earlier this year a group of petitioners, including League of Fans, successfully pushed the Federal Communications Commission to solicit public comment to review the legality of the NFL’s blackout rule. Will the NFL’s strategic move be enough to keep the FCC from taking action to end the blackout rule altogether?
It should not.
A group of independent economists say it doesn’t even make sense economically for the NFL to impose its television blackouts on fans. This from the economists’ joint filing to the FCC:
“Academic research supports the conclusion that local television blackouts have little or no effect on ticket sales or attendance for the game that is being televised. Local blackouts of home games harm consumers without producing a significant financial benefit to teams.”
So far, only the Tampa Bay Buccaneers have taken advantage of lowering the blackout threshold to 85% capacity for this season. The Bucs home games, in a publicly-funded stadium, were seen on television only a few times by their own fan base over the last two seasons. That’s a lot of missed opportunities to develop the next generation of Bucs fans with kids finding something else to do during football season. At the same time, a wedge is driven between the team and longtime fans who cannot afford to attend regularly at the stadium that their tax dollars built. But at least the Bucs will try to stop the blackouts this season to the extent that the NFL allows.
In contrast, the Tennessee Titans, Indianapolis Colts, San Diego Chargers, Jacksonville Jaguars, Cleveland Browns and Buffalo Bills have reportedly chosen to maintain the status quo and require sellouts before allowing their own fans to watch home games on television. The final deadline for each team to inform the league of its intentions regarding the blackout rule is August 9.
Now that it’s clear very little has changed other than direct team involvement, fans can voice their anger at individual teams rather than only blaming the NFL for imposing blackouts. Fans will wonder how team owners can squeeze the public out of hundreds of millions of dollars for stadiums by threatening to move the team, then hold fans hostage by the blackout rule out of fear that they will not be able to see the games on television. Here’s what Dan Wetzel wrote back in May about this absurdity regarding the Minnesota Vikings new stadium deal:
“Minnesota is going to get a new stadium. The Vikings are going to stay put. And the taxpayers are going to pay to build a state-of-the-art cash machine of a stadium for a billion-dollar organization that doesn’t have to even guarantee the games will be on television.”
During a time of massive economic struggle and high unemployment, the NFL could have done something significant beginning this season. The league should have ended its counterproductive and coercive blackouts voluntarily, especially after the FCC announced a review.
But that’s a lot to expect from a bully. Let’s hope the FCC and elected leaders hear the collective voice of the fans and take away the bully’s weapon. It’s time for the FCC to take action and put an end to the NFL’s abusive blackout rule.
Shawn McCarthy is a librarian & archivist in Washington DC. He is editor of leagueoffans.org, and was formerly project director of League of Fans.
Sports Forum Podcast
Episode #32 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: Prolific Author Joe Posnanski Joins the Show – Posnanski is one of America’s best sportswriters and has twice been named the best sports columnist in America by the Associated Press Sports Editors. We chat about his new book, “Why We Love Baseball,” his new Substack newsletter called Joe Blogs, and we cover topics including how baseball treats its fans, MLB’s numerous rule changes this past season, how the sport can become more fan-friendly, the greatness of Negro Leagues champion Buck O’Neil, and much more.
Follow on Facebook: @SportsForumPodcast
Episode #31 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: Foul Ball Safety Is Still an Important Issue at Ballparks – Our guests are Jordan Skopp, founder of FoulBallSafety.com and Greg Wilkowski, a Chicago based attorney. We discuss the historical problem of foul balls injuring fans and why some teams are still hesitant to put up protective netting in some minor league and college baseball parks.
Episode #30 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: The State of College Athletics with Dr. David Ridpath: Problems and Potential Solutions – Ridpath is a sports administration professor at Ohio University and a member of The Drake Group, a college sports reform think tank.
Episode #29 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: The Honorable Tom McMillen Visits League of Fans’ Sports Forum – McMillen is a former All-American basketball player, Olympian, Rhodes Scholar and U.S. Congressman. We discuss the state of college athletics today.
Episode #28 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: A Chat With Mano Watsa, a Leading Basketball and Life Educator – Watsa is President of PGC Basketball, the largest education basketball camp in the world. We discuss problems in youth sports today.
Episode #27 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: Kids’ Sports: How We Can Take Back the Game and Restore Quality Family Time In the Process – Linda Flanagan is author of “Take Back the Game: How Money and Mania Are Ruining Kids’ Sports and Why It Matters.” We discuss how commercialized and professionalized youth sports are hurting kids and their families.
Media"How We Can Save Sports" author Ken Reed appears on Fox & Friends to explain how there's "too much adult in youth sports."
Ken Reed appears on Mornings with Gail from KFKA Radio in Colorado to discuss bad parenting in youth athletics.
“Should College Athletes Be Paid?” Ken Reed on The Morning Show from Wisconsin Public Radio
Ken Reed appears on KGNU Community Radio in Colorado (at 02:30) to discuss equality in sports and Title IX.
Ken Reed appears on the Ralph Nader Radio Hour (at 38:35) to discuss his book The Sports Reformers: Working to Make the World of Sports a Better Place, and to talk about some current sports issues.
- Reed Appears on Ralph Nader Radio Hour League of Fans’ sports policy director, Ken Reed, Ralph Nader and the New York Times’ Tyler Kepner discussed a variety of sports issues on Nader’s radio show as well as Reed’s updated book, How We Can Save Sports: A Game Plan. Reed's book was released in paperback in February, and has a new introduction and several updated sections.
League of Fans is a sports reform project founded by Ralph Nader to fight for the higher principles of justice, fair play, equal opportunity and civil rights in sports; and to encourage safety and civic responsibility in sports industry and culture.
Vanderbilt Sport & Society - On The Ball with Andrew Maraniss with guest Ken Reed, Sports Policy Director for League of Fans and author of How We Can Save Sports: A Game Plan
Sports & Torts – Ken Reed, Sports Policy Director, League of Fans – at the American Museum of Tort Law
Order from Amazon
Order from Amazon
Order from Amazon
Ken Reed’s Author Page on Amazon