By Ken Reed
What are we to make of the Olympic Games? Do they represent humanity at its finest? Its worst? Or both?
A fair assessment would have to conclude it’s both.
The modern Olympics were established in 1896 by Baron Pierre de Coubertin to bring the world’s athletes together in the “spirit of unity, peace, communication and cooperation.” There was nothing in his vision about Olympic power brokers — in alliance with corporate executives — creating a spectacle of crass commercialization, unabashed greed, and autocratic control of the participating athletes. But that’s what we have with London 2012 — and actually every Olympics since 1984, when former Major League Baseball commissioner Peter Uebberoth sold the soul of the Los Angeles Games by hawking sponsorships to everything, and I mean everything, Olympics-related.
The Olympics are about great sprints to the finish, but above all, in the modern era, they’re about a mad dash for money.
The International Olympic Committee (IOC) leads the way, having successfully milked nearly $5 billion from broadcasters and sponsors in the latest four-year cycle. The 11 official Olympic sponsors have been busy for months slapping their logo, along with the Olympic rings, on anything that moves. These mega brands — along with many more licensed “domestic sponsors” — use every marketing platform available to get out their corporate messaging on the shoulders of the world’s greatest athletes. This is the plastic version of the Olympic Games, in which official sponsors compete to commodify the entire Olympic experience.
And the official sponsors aren’t the only ones playing this game. There are numerous ambush marketers, non-Olympic corporations trying to pass themselves off as official sponsors, who work to associate themselves with the Games in ways only limited by the imaginations of company marketing executives. These companies use pictures of Olympic-looking athletes, and related imagery, to convey messages like “We’re a proud supporter of your country’s team!”
The Olympic park in London has an official Olympic superstore and megastore (I’m not sure what qualifies a store to be designated “mega” as opposed to simply “super”) designed to push licensed Olympic souvenirs and merchandise to anyone who’s breathing in the vicinity. Meanwhile, the official Olympic sponsorship police have been busy marching around the Olympic park and village placing stickers over brand names that aren’t officially associated with the Olympics. This includes covering the brand name and logo on the hand dryers in restrooms. I kid you not.
The British Government is spending $14.5 billion to host these Games. The rationale of the politicians involved is that the Games will be an economic boost for London and the country as a whole. Britain’s prime minister, David Cameron, promised the British populace that he would “turn these games into gold” for Britain. But multiple economic impact studies have concluded that is highly unlikely. One researcher, Victor Matheson, from the College of Holy Cross, says organizers of big sporting events overestimate the benefits and significantly underestimate the costs.
One benefit that’s been overestimated is the positive impact hosting the Games will have on the psyches of Great Britain’s citizens. A study by Georgios Kavetsos, of the Case Business School in London, and Stefan Szymanski of the University of Michigan, found no statistically significant rise in national happiness attributable to hosting the Olympics.
As disgusting as the overcommercialization has been surrounding this year’s Olympics, there have been other aspects that have been just as ugly. For example, consider that during the Olympic Games — when the vast majority of the athletes are at their most marketable — participating athletes are forbidden from appearing in advertisements that do not involve official Olympic advertisers.
Nick Symmonds is an obscure American 800-meter runner. His big chance at track and field glory will come in the London Olympics. Coming into the Games, he realized that the earning potential associated with his Olympic performance has a small window. Therefore, he decided to auction off body parts for tattoo advertising. For $11,000, a small Milwaukee advertising firm bought the rights to Symmonds’ shoulder. Symmonds agreed to place a temporary tattoo of the company’s logo on his shoulder during the Olympic competition.
Symmonds has received a lot of support. His action is seen as creative by many, and shrewd by others. He clearly owns the right to put tattoo advertising on his body. However, it is against Olympic policy. The argument against him is that the Olympics are a voluntary event and can establish the rules for participation. As such, he’ll have to succumb to Olympic rules if he wants to compete in the 2012 Olympic Games.
Last month, Symmonds said: “I’ve never had a problem speaking out about something that bothers me. The biggest thing that rubs me the wrong way is that governing bodies want to control the space I feel I should control.”
On another front, an Australian Olympic boxer, Damien Hooper, was banned from wearing a t-shirt bearing the Aboriginal flag during his time at the Olympics. In fact, he was forced to apologize to Australian team chef de mission Nick Green before partaking in his second round boxing match.
Hooper was upset he wasn’t allowed to wear the shirt again while staying in London.
“I was proud that I did it, I don’t regret doing it,” said Hooper.
Should participating in the Olympics mean athletes have to give up their freedom of speech rights? Was that part of de Coubertin’s vision for the Olympic Games?
With the Symmonds and Hooper cases, you can chalk up two more strikes against the little guy in our commercialized sports world.
As someone who loves the original intent of sports in general, and the Olympics in particular, I’m doing my best to focus on the beauty and drama of high-level athletic competition, while simultaneously trying to ignore the stomach-turning crass commercialization and draconian restrictions on athletes’ rights.
Believe me, it isn’t easy.
— Ken Reed, Sports Policy Director, League of Fans
Sports Forum Podcast
Episode #32 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: Prolific Author Joe Posnanski Joins the Show – Posnanski is one of America’s best sportswriters and has twice been named the best sports columnist in America by the Associated Press Sports Editors. We chat about his new book, “Why We Love Baseball,” his new Substack newsletter called Joe Blogs, and we cover topics including how baseball treats its fans, MLB’s numerous rule changes this past season, how the sport can become more fan-friendly, the greatness of Negro Leagues champion Buck O’Neil, and much more.
Follow on Facebook: @SportsForumPodcast
Episode #31 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: Foul Ball Safety Is Still an Important Issue at Ballparks – Our guests are Jordan Skopp, founder of FoulBallSafety.com and Greg Wilkowski, a Chicago based attorney. We discuss the historical problem of foul balls injuring fans and why some teams are still hesitant to put up protective netting in some minor league and college baseball parks.
Episode #30 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: The State of College Athletics with Dr. David Ridpath: Problems and Potential Solutions – Ridpath is a sports administration professor at Ohio University and a member of The Drake Group, a college sports reform think tank.
Episode #29 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: The Honorable Tom McMillen Visits League of Fans’ Sports Forum – McMillen is a former All-American basketball player, Olympian, Rhodes Scholar and U.S. Congressman. We discuss the state of college athletics today.
Episode #28 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: A Chat With Mano Watsa, a Leading Basketball and Life Educator – Watsa is President of PGC Basketball, the largest education basketball camp in the world. We discuss problems in youth sports today.
Episode #27 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: Kids’ Sports: How We Can Take Back the Game and Restore Quality Family Time In the Process – Linda Flanagan is author of “Take Back the Game: How Money and Mania Are Ruining Kids’ Sports and Why It Matters.” We discuss how commercialized and professionalized youth sports are hurting kids and their families.
Media"How We Can Save Sports" author Ken Reed appears on Fox & Friends to explain how there's "too much adult in youth sports."
Ken Reed appears on Mornings with Gail from KFKA Radio in Colorado to discuss bad parenting in youth athletics.
“Should College Athletes Be Paid?” Ken Reed on The Morning Show from Wisconsin Public Radio
Ken Reed appears on KGNU Community Radio in Colorado (at 02:30) to discuss equality in sports and Title IX.
Ken Reed appears on the Ralph Nader Radio Hour (at 38:35) to discuss his book The Sports Reformers: Working to Make the World of Sports a Better Place, and to talk about some current sports issues.
- Reed Appears on Ralph Nader Radio Hour League of Fans’ sports policy director, Ken Reed, Ralph Nader and the New York Times’ Tyler Kepner discussed a variety of sports issues on Nader’s radio show as well as Reed’s updated book, How We Can Save Sports: A Game Plan. Reed's book was released in paperback in February, and has a new introduction and several updated sections.
League of Fans is a sports reform project founded by Ralph Nader to fight for the higher principles of justice, fair play, equal opportunity and civil rights in sports; and to encourage safety and civic responsibility in sports industry and culture.
Vanderbilt Sport & Society - On The Ball with Andrew Maraniss with guest Ken Reed, Sports Policy Director for League of Fans and author of How We Can Save Sports: A Game Plan
Sports & Torts – Ken Reed, Sports Policy Director, League of Fans – at the American Museum of Tort Law
Order from Amazon
Order from Amazon
Order from Amazon
Ken Reed’s Author Page on Amazon