By Ken Reed
What are we to make of the Olympic Games? Do they represent humanity at its finest? Its worst? Or both?
A fair assessment would have to conclude it’s both.
The modern Olympics were established in 1896 by Baron Pierre de Coubertin to bring the world’s athletes together in the “spirit of unity, peace, communication and cooperation.” There was nothing in his vision about Olympic power brokers — in alliance with corporate executives — creating a spectacle of crass commercialization, unabashed greed, and autocratic control of the participating athletes. But that’s what we have with London 2012 — and actually every Olympics since 1984, when former Major League Baseball commissioner Peter Uebberoth sold the soul of the Los Angeles Games by hawking sponsorships to everything, and I mean everything, Olympics-related.
The Olympics are about great sprints to the finish, but above all, in the modern era, they’re about a mad dash for money.
The International Olympic Committee (IOC) leads the way, having successfully milked nearly $5 billion from broadcasters and sponsors in the latest four-year cycle. The 11 official Olympic sponsors have been busy for months slapping their logo, along with the Olympic rings, on anything that moves. These mega brands — along with many more licensed “domestic sponsors” — use every marketing platform available to get out their corporate messaging on the shoulders of the world’s greatest athletes. This is the plastic version of the Olympic Games, in which official sponsors compete to commodify the entire Olympic experience.
And the official sponsors aren’t the only ones playing this game. There are numerous ambush marketers, non-Olympic corporations trying to pass themselves off as official sponsors, who work to associate themselves with the Games in ways only limited by the imaginations of company marketing executives. These companies use pictures of Olympic-looking athletes, and related imagery, to convey messages like “We’re a proud supporter of your country’s team!”
The Olympic park in London has an official Olympic superstore and megastore (I’m not sure what qualifies a store to be designated “mega” as opposed to simply “super”) designed to push licensed Olympic souvenirs and merchandise to anyone who’s breathing in the vicinity. Meanwhile, the official Olympic sponsorship police have been busy marching around the Olympic park and village placing stickers over brand names that aren’t officially associated with the Olympics. This includes covering the brand name and logo on the hand dryers in restrooms. I kid you not.
The British Government is spending $14.5 billion to host these Games. The rationale of the politicians involved is that the Games will be an economic boost for London and the country as a whole. Britain’s prime minister, David Cameron, promised the British populace that he would “turn these games into gold” for Britain. But multiple economic impact studies have concluded that is highly unlikely. One researcher, Victor Matheson, from the College of Holy Cross, says organizers of big sporting events overestimate the benefits and significantly underestimate the costs.
One benefit that’s been overestimated is the positive impact hosting the Games will have on the psyches of Great Britain’s citizens. A study by Georgios Kavetsos, of the Case Business School in London, and Stefan Szymanski of the University of Michigan, found no statistically significant rise in national happiness attributable to hosting the Olympics.
As disgusting as the overcommercialization has been surrounding this year’s Olympics, there have been other aspects that have been just as ugly. For example, consider that during the Olympic Games — when the vast majority of the athletes are at their most marketable — participating athletes are forbidden from appearing in advertisements that do not involve official Olympic advertisers.
Nick Symmonds is an obscure American 800-meter runner. His big chance at track and field glory will come in the London Olympics. Coming into the Games, he realized that the earning potential associated with his Olympic performance has a small window. Therefore, he decided to auction off body parts for tattoo advertising. For $11,000, a small Milwaukee advertising firm bought the rights to Symmonds’ shoulder. Symmonds agreed to place a temporary tattoo of the company’s logo on his shoulder during the Olympic competition.
Symmonds has received a lot of support. His action is seen as creative by many, and shrewd by others. He clearly owns the right to put tattoo advertising on his body. However, it is against Olympic policy. The argument against him is that the Olympics are a voluntary event and can establish the rules for participation. As such, he’ll have to succumb to Olympic rules if he wants to compete in the 2012 Olympic Games.
Last month, Symmonds said: “I’ve never had a problem speaking out about something that bothers me. The biggest thing that rubs me the wrong way is that governing bodies want to control the space I feel I should control.”
On another front, an Australian Olympic boxer, Damien Hooper, was banned from wearing a t-shirt bearing the Aboriginal flag during his time at the Olympics. In fact, he was forced to apologize to Australian team chef de mission Nick Green before partaking in his second round boxing match.
Hooper was upset he wasn’t allowed to wear the shirt again while staying in London.
“I was proud that I did it, I don’t regret doing it,” said Hooper.
Should participating in the Olympics mean athletes have to give up their freedom of speech rights? Was that part of de Coubertin’s vision for the Olympic Games?
With the Symmonds and Hooper cases, you can chalk up two more strikes against the little guy in our commercialized sports world.
As someone who loves the original intent of sports in general, and the Olympics in particular, I’m doing my best to focus on the beauty and drama of high-level athletic competition, while simultaneously trying to ignore the stomach-turning crass commercialization and draconian restrictions on athletes’ rights.
Believe me, it isn’t easy.
— Ken Reed, Sports Policy Director, League of Fans
Sports Forum Podcast
Episode #10 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: An Issues Discussion With Paul Dolan – Dolan is the Cleveland Indians Owner and CEO. He discusses the use of Native American names and logos by sports teams and the decisions to drop the Chief Wahoo logo and the upcoming change to the team name. Other baseball topics include health and safety, possible MLB rule changes and youth participation in the sport.
Follow on Facebook: @SportsForumPodcast
Episode #9 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: Talking Sports Issues With Ralph Nader – Nader is a consumer advocate and was named one of the “100 Most Influential Americans of the 20th Century” by Time magazine. He is the founder of League of Fans.
Episode #8 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: How Can We Save College Sports From Overcommercialization and Professionalization? – The guest is Dr. David Ridpath, a sports business professor and past president of the Drake Group
Episode #7 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: Brain Trauma and CTE Risk in Sports With Dr. Ann McKee – Dr. McKee works in the field of neuropathology and has demonstrated that “mild” repetitive head trauma can provoke chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), a devastating neurodegenerative disease.
Episode #6 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: The Need for Quality Physical Education in Our Schools is Greater Than Ever – The guest is Clayton Ellis, one of our nation’s leading advocates for getting our young people to be more physically active.
Episode #5 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: Youth Sports with Positive Coaching Alliance Founder Jim Thompson – Thompson started Positive Coaching Alliance (PCA) in 1998 to help create a movement to transform the culture of youth sports from “win-at-all-costs” to a positive, character-building experience.
Media"How We Can Save Sports" author Ken Reed appears on Fox & Friends to explain how there's "too much adult in youth sports."
Ken Reed appears on Mornings with Gail from KFKA Radio in Colorado to discuss bad parenting in youth athletics.
“Should College Athletes Be Paid?” Ken Reed on The Morning Show from Wisconsin Public Radio
Ken Reed appears on KGNU Community Radio in Colorado (at 02:30) to discuss equality in sports and Title IX.
Ken Reed appears on the Ralph Nader Radio Hour (at 38:35) to discuss his book The Sports Reformers: Working to Make the World of Sports a Better Place, and to talk about some current sports issues.
Sports & Torts – Ken Reed, Sports Policy Director, League of Fans – at the American Museum of Tort Law
League of Fans is a sports reform project founded by Ralph Nader to fight for the higher principles of justice, fair play, equal opportunity and civil rights in sports; and to encourage safety and civic responsibility in sports industry and culture.
Order from Amazon
Order from Amazon
Order from Amazon
Ken Reed’s Author Page on Amazon