By Ken Reed
USC athletic director Pat Haden is boasting about how progressive his school is by offering four-year scholarships to football and men’s and women’s basketball players.
In a statement yesterday, Haden said, “In taking this action, USC hopes to help lead the effort to refocus on student-athlete welfare on and off the field.”
I’m sure Haden is bruised today from patting himself on the back so excessively yesterday. It’s somewhat ironic that USC is boasting about leading the way on the student-welfare front, given it’s fairly sordid history of NCAA rules violations, probations, etc.
Haden didn’t mention a couple things. For one thing, USC is far from the first school to take this action since the NCAA re-allowed four-year scholarships in 2011. Several Big Ten schools already offer four-years scholarships, as do a few other schools in the major conferences. Moreover, Northwestern has taken a bigger step, offering four-year scholarships in every sport on campus. USC’s plan is to only offer revenue sport athletes the four-year option.
Nevertheless, a high-profile school like USC taking this action is a positive.
Four-year scholarships (they should become five-year scholarships if an athlete is red-shirted) empower student-athletes and protect them from over-zealous coaches and athletic directors who currently have the power to drop athletes from scholarship due to injury or athletic performance – even if the athlete is excelling in the classroom. In practice, one-year “renewable” scholarships are really one-year “revocable” scholarships. That’s not a system that values athletes as students. It’s a system that’s unethical and unfair to the students.
Multi-year scholarships were once the norm in the NCAA. The NCAA dropped multi-year scholarships in favor of one-year revocable scholarships in 1973. The move saved coaches and athletic directors money while simultaneously giving them more power and control over their athletes.
Today, coaches have a great amount of control over college scholarship athletes, on and off the playing fields and courts, including where they live, what they eat, when they eat, what campus activities they can partake in, how long they can go home in the summer, and in some cases, what classes they take. From the athletes’ perspective, under a one-year revocable scholarship system, sports have to be their top priority on campus or they risk losing their financial aid. A student that’s fully meeting a school’s academic standards, as well as team rules for his/her sport, should not have a scholarship pulled because the coach believes the student’s athletic performance is subpar.
A four-year scholarship system is a significant improvement. But there is still room for abuse. USC, Northwestern and other schools now offering four-year scholarships must put policies in place that prevent coaches or athletic directors from running off (literally, in some cases) athletes they deem aren’t performing well enough.
To maximize protections for student-athletes, all athletic scholarships, should be managed by the institution’s financial aid office. Of course, coaches would retain the right to offer athletic scholarships to whomever they wish if the students meet NCAA and institution requirements. However, after the athlete accepts the scholarship offer, management of the scholarship would move to the school’s financial aid office.
The fact several big-time athletic departments are now offering four-year scholarships vs. one-year revocable scholarships is a positive trend, one that hopefully will pick up momentum across the NCAA. However, there are still many miles to go on the college reform front. Scholarships are just one area needing significant reform.
— Ken Reed, Sports Policy Director, League of Fans
Sports Forum Podcast
Episode #26 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: How Can We Fix Youth Sports? – John O’Sullivan is Founder and CEO of Changing the Game Project and author of “Changing the Game: The Parents Guide to Raising Happy, High Performing Athletes and Giving Youth Sports Back to Our Kids.” We discuss overzealous adults in youth sports, the dangers of sport specialization, youth sports entrepreneurs and the profit-at-all-costs mindset, and the growing socio-economic gap in youth sports.
Follow on Facebook: @SportsForumPodcast
Episode #25 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: Physical Education Should Be a Critical Component of K-12 School Design – Michael Horn is co-founder of the Clayton Christensen Institute for Disruptive Innovation.
Episode #24 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: Mental Health and Athletes: Ending the Stigma – Nathan Braaten and Taylor Ricci are the founders of Dam Worth It, a non-profit created to end the stigma around mental health at colleges and universities through sport, storytelling, and community creation.
Episode #23 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: Olympian Benita Fitzgerald Mosley Talks Title IX, Youth Sports and the Olympics.
Episode #22 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: Rethinking Sports Fandom with Author Craig Calcaterra – We discuss Calcaterra’s new book “Rethinking Fandom: How to Beat the Sports-Industrial Complex at Its Own Game” and explore new ways to be a fan.
Episode #21 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: Chatting About a Broken Game With Baseball Writer Pedro Moura – Moura is a national baseball writer for Fox Sports. We discuss how and why the game of baseball is broken, what factors caused it, and offer a few thoughts on how to “fix” a great game.
Media"How We Can Save Sports" author Ken Reed appears on Fox & Friends to explain how there's "too much adult in youth sports."
Ken Reed appears on Mornings with Gail from KFKA Radio in Colorado to discuss bad parenting in youth athletics.
“Should College Athletes Be Paid?” Ken Reed on The Morning Show from Wisconsin Public Radio
Ken Reed appears on KGNU Community Radio in Colorado (at 02:30) to discuss equality in sports and Title IX.
Ken Reed appears on the Ralph Nader Radio Hour (at 38:35) to discuss his book The Sports Reformers: Working to Make the World of Sports a Better Place, and to talk about some current sports issues.
- League of Fans Sports Policy Director Ken Reed quoted in Washington Post column titled "What happened to P.E.? It’s losing ground in our push for academic improvement," by Jay Mathews
League of Fans is a sports reform project founded by Ralph Nader to fight for the higher principles of justice, fair play, equal opportunity and civil rights in sports; and to encourage safety and civic responsibility in sports industry and culture.
Sports & Torts – Ken Reed, Sports Policy Director, League of Fans – at the American Museum of Tort Law
Order from Amazon
Order from Amazon
Order from Amazon
Ken Reed’s Author Page on Amazon