“There is no industry like baseball in our country. It has special status as a monopoly, and it is completely unregulated. Right now baseball exploits the hell out of the cities.”
— Andrew Zimbalist, American economist and Robert A. Woods Professor of Economics at Smith College.
“The initial rationale for the baseball exemption was probably not good law in 1921, when the Supreme Court ruled that the antitrust laws did not apply to baseball because baseball was not engaged in interstate commerce.”
— Roger Noll, American economist and emeritus professor of economics at Stanford University.
By Ken Reed
The special treatment MLB receives in the form of its antitrust exemption allows a small group of wealthy owners, who may or may not care about baseball beyond an economic perspective, to control a major cultural practice (indeed one historically called “the national pastime”) as they see fit.
Former MLB commissioner Fay Vincent said baseball should lose its exemption if the owners significantly dilute the commissioner’s traditional powers to act in the best interests of the game. Well, the owners didn’t like that. They decided they wanted a puppet they could control as commissioner. They fired Vincent for acting too independently. As he was shown the door, Vincent said he was just operating in “the best interests of baseball.”
The best interests of the game are not the top priority of baseball owners as long as their government-sanctioned cartel is allowed to continue. For owners of businesses in other industries, neglecting stakeholder groups’ needs, wants and expectations means eventual death – usually sooner rather than later.
2022 is the 100th anniversary of baseball’s antitrust exemption. For the first 50 years, with a few minor exceptions, baseball owners had an ironclad hold on the monopoly status given them via the antitrust exemption. However, 50 years ago there were signs that owners might not be able to keep the exemption forever.
In 1972, the Supreme Court took on the Curt Flood case (Flood v. Kuhn). In Flood, the Court stated what was obvious to so many legal and business observers, specifically that “professional baseball is a business, and it is engaged in interstate commerce.” Nevertheless, the Court ultimately upheld baseball’s antitrust exemption.
Ironically, it is a recent college athletics case that might be the impetus for eliminating MLB’s antitrust exemption. In NCAA v. Alston, the Supreme Court reached a 9-0 decision to uphold a ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit that struck down NCAA caps on student-athlete academic benefits on antitrust grounds.
In Alston, Justice Neil Gorsuch, writing for the Court, addressed MLB’s exemption. He called it “unrealistic, inconsistent, and aberrational.” In his opinion, Gorsuch suggested that legislators address the problem with MLB’s antitrust exemption. But he also hinted that the Court could decide to abolish the Court’s MLB antitrust exemption if legislators continue to pass on the issue.
Eventually, the 100-year-old mistake that is baseball’s antitrust exemption will be fixed, either by Congress or the Supreme Court.
After watching how the owners operated in the recent lockout, the fix can’t come soon enough.
— Ken Reed, Sports Policy Director, League of Fans
Sports Forum Podcast
Episode #21 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: Chatting About a Broken Game With Baseball Writer Pedro Moura – Moura is a national baseball writer for Fox Sports. He previously covered the Los Angeles Dodgers for The Athletic. His new book is titled “How to Beat a Broken Game: The Rise of the Dodgers in a League on the Brink.” We discuss how and why the game of baseball is broken, what factors caused it, and offer a few thoughts on how to “fix” a great game.
Follow on Facebook: @SportsForumPodcast
Episode #20 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: Coaching Youth and High School Sports Based On What’s Best for the Athlete’s Holistic Development – We chat with long-time youth, high school and college basketball coach Jim Huber.
Episode #19 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: Capturing the Spirit of the All-American Girls Professional Baseball League with Anika Orrock – We discuss the hoops AAGPFL women had to jump through to play the game they loved as well as the long-term impact and legacy they have in advancing sports opportunities for girls and women.
Episode #18 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: Talking about the 50th Anniversary of Title IX and the Lia Thomas Controversy with Nancy Hogshead-Makar – Hogshead-Makar is a triple gold medalist in swimming, a civil rights attorney and CEO of Champion Women.
Episode #17 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: Talking Sports With Legendary New York Times Sports Columnist Robert Lipsyte – We chat about Lipsyte’s amazing career and some of the athletes he covered.
Episode #16 – League of Fans’ Sports Forum podcast: Andrew Maraniss: Outstanding Author of Books That Focus On the Intersection of Sports, History and Social Justice.
Media"How We Can Save Sports" author Ken Reed appears on Fox & Friends to explain how there's "too much adult in youth sports."
Ken Reed appears on Mornings with Gail from KFKA Radio in Colorado to discuss bad parenting in youth athletics.
“Should College Athletes Be Paid?” Ken Reed on The Morning Show from Wisconsin Public Radio
Ken Reed appears on KGNU Community Radio in Colorado (at 02:30) to discuss equality in sports and Title IX.
Ken Reed appears on the Ralph Nader Radio Hour (at 38:35) to discuss his book The Sports Reformers: Working to Make the World of Sports a Better Place, and to talk about some current sports issues.
Sports & Torts – Ken Reed, Sports Policy Director, League of Fans – at the American Museum of Tort Law
League of Fans is a sports reform project founded by Ralph Nader to fight for the higher principles of justice, fair play, equal opportunity and civil rights in sports; and to encourage safety and civic responsibility in sports industry and culture.
Order from Amazon
Order from Amazon
Order from Amazon
Ken Reed’s Author Page on Amazon